In honor of this National Writing Month, or whatever the bloody thing is calling itself, I've been trying to hash out a workable story. Oh, there's the Carnival thing, that's been fun and a nice way to exercise brain cells that've been snoozing, but I'd like to work on something that I could point to and say, "That's mine. I did that."
So far, I've written quite a bit. Deleted a lot, too. The problem with being a rabid reader is that I can look at just about anything I've written, and say "Heinlein did that." "Bradbury did that." "Pratchett did that. Twice." Koontz. King. Butler. Hamilton. Lovecraft. Updike. Tolkein. Hickman and Weiss. Asimov. Robinson. Shelley (Mary, that is.)
Hell, I got fourteen pages into a short story the other day before I remembered I'd read a Sidney Sheldon trash novel along those same lines.
This week's Community Ed labors will be spent trying to think of
One. Original. Idea.
Failing that, I've got to think of a way to be unoriginal, with style.
And now, Pratchett talks about writing.
If you didn't bother to watch all that, let me sum it up.
His best piece of advice for people who want to write is "make sure you're born me." Yeah, I know. Helpful. Still. I recently finished Making Money, the latest Discworld book. Then I reread The Colour of Magic, the first Discworld book. You could barely tell they were written by the same guy. Frankly, I remember reading Colour when I was in Junior High, and I had hated it. It was plotless, not all that funny, and the characters were sight gags with names. Twoflower and Rincewind, today, are some of my favorite characters of his. He got better. A lot better. It was years later that I became a fan of his, and I was a little surprised to find he'd written Colour. I still don't like that one, but it's fascinating from a technical point of view. To see how his style emerged, how he grew as a writer.
It's like reading Christine, by Stephen King, which will always be my favorite King book, and then Insomnia, allegedly by the same guy. His writing changed utterly and fundamentally midway through his career. Unlike Pratchett, though, King got a lot worse. He quit the coke and the booze, and all the soul drained out of his work. He grew technically, of course, his works today are masterfully built. But if they were architecture they'd be Dams, not Cathedrals. Functional, even beautiful in an abstract sense, but not inspiring. Not anymore.
I looked back at what writing of mine I managed to find saved online - none of my old notebooks survived the passage of time - old Carnival posts, story submissions to gaming sites, bits of short fiction archived at contest sites. It's terrible, terrible stuff. But I see that. I'm taking it as a good sign, a sign that I've improved as a writer, enough so that I'm not making the same mistakes I did at twenty or twenty-five. Now, at thirty-four, I think my prose is flowing more smoothly, my descriptors are clearer and disrupt the mood less abruptly than they did, and my characters show a lot more depth. Maybe I'm not improved enough, yet, but still. It's progress.
One wonders what the me at forty-three will say when he looks back on this post. Probably sneer at my syntax and simplistic imagery. Screw you, older me! I don't see you helping, here.
Sigh.
Maybe I should teach this stuff. "Those who can't," and all that.
So far, I've written quite a bit. Deleted a lot, too. The problem with being a rabid reader is that I can look at just about anything I've written, and say "Heinlein did that." "Bradbury did that." "Pratchett did that. Twice." Koontz. King. Butler. Hamilton. Lovecraft. Updike. Tolkein. Hickman and Weiss. Asimov. Robinson. Shelley (Mary, that is.)
Hell, I got fourteen pages into a short story the other day before I remembered I'd read a Sidney Sheldon trash novel along those same lines.
This week's Community Ed labors will be spent trying to think of
One. Original. Idea.
Failing that, I've got to think of a way to be unoriginal, with style.
And now, Pratchett talks about writing.
If you didn't bother to watch all that, let me sum it up.
His best piece of advice for people who want to write is "make sure you're born me." Yeah, I know. Helpful. Still. I recently finished Making Money, the latest Discworld book. Then I reread The Colour of Magic, the first Discworld book. You could barely tell they were written by the same guy. Frankly, I remember reading Colour when I was in Junior High, and I had hated it. It was plotless, not all that funny, and the characters were sight gags with names. Twoflower and Rincewind, today, are some of my favorite characters of his. He got better. A lot better. It was years later that I became a fan of his, and I was a little surprised to find he'd written Colour. I still don't like that one, but it's fascinating from a technical point of view. To see how his style emerged, how he grew as a writer.
It's like reading Christine, by Stephen King, which will always be my favorite King book, and then Insomnia, allegedly by the same guy. His writing changed utterly and fundamentally midway through his career. Unlike Pratchett, though, King got a lot worse. He quit the coke and the booze, and all the soul drained out of his work. He grew technically, of course, his works today are masterfully built. But if they were architecture they'd be Dams, not Cathedrals. Functional, even beautiful in an abstract sense, but not inspiring. Not anymore.
I looked back at what writing of mine I managed to find saved online - none of my old notebooks survived the passage of time - old Carnival posts, story submissions to gaming sites, bits of short fiction archived at contest sites. It's terrible, terrible stuff. But I see that. I'm taking it as a good sign, a sign that I've improved as a writer, enough so that I'm not making the same mistakes I did at twenty or twenty-five. Now, at thirty-four, I think my prose is flowing more smoothly, my descriptors are clearer and disrupt the mood less abruptly than they did, and my characters show a lot more depth. Maybe I'm not improved enough, yet, but still. It's progress.
One wonders what the me at forty-three will say when he looks back on this post. Probably sneer at my syntax and simplistic imagery. Screw you, older me! I don't see you helping, here.
Sigh.
Maybe I should teach this stuff. "Those who can't," and all that.
1 comment | Leave a comment

